terça-feira, 28 de junho de 2016

Why the British said no to Europe



Why the British said no to Europe


By John Pilger

The majority vote by Britons to leave the European Union was an act of raw
democracy. Millions of ordinary people refused to be bullied, intimidated and
dismissed with open contempt by their presumed betters in the major parties, the
leaders of the business and banking oligarchy and the media.

This was, in great part, a vote by those angered and demoralised by the sheer
arrogance of the apologists for the “remain” campaign and the dismemberment of a
socially just civil life in Britain. The last bastion of the historic reforms of
1945, the National Health Service, has been so subverted by Tory and
Labour-supported privateers it is fighting for its life.

A forewarning came when the Treasurer, George Osborne, the embodiment of both
Britain’s ancient regime and the banking mafia in Europe, threatened to cut £30
billion from public services if people voted the wrong way; it was blackmail on
a shocking scale.

Immigration was exploited in the campaign with consummate cynicism, not only by
populist politicians from the lunar right, but by Labour politicians drawing on
their own venerable tradition of promoting and nurturing racism, a symptom of
corruption not at the bottom but at the top. The reason millions of refugees
have fled the Middle East – irst Iraq, now Syria – are the invasions and
imperial mayhem of Britain, the United States, France, the European Union and
Nato. Before that, there was the wilful destruction of Yugoslavia. Before that,
there was the theft of Palestine and the imposition of Israel.

The pith helmets may have long gone, but the blood has never dried. A nineteenth
century contempt for countries and peoples, depending on their degree of
colonial usefulness, remains a centrepiece of modern “globalisation”, with its
perverse socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor: its freedom for
capital and denial of freedom to labour; its perfidious politicians and
politicised civil servants.

All this has now come home to Europe, enriching the likes of Tony Blair and
impoverishing and disempowering millions. On 23 June, the British said no more.

The most effective propagandists of the “European ideal” have not been the far
right, but an insufferably patrician class for whom metropolitan London is the
United Kingdom. Its leading members see themselves as liberal, enlightened,
cultivated tribunes of the 21st century zeitgeist, even “cool”. What they really
are is a bourgeoisie with insatiable consumerist tastes and ancient instincts of
their own superiority. In their house paper, the Guardian, they have gloated,
day after day, at those who would even consider the EU profoundly undemocratic,
a source of social injustice and a virulent extremism known as “neoliberalism”.

The aim of this extremism is to install a permanent, capitalist theocracy that
ensures a two-thirds society, with the majority divided and indebted, managed by
a corporate class, and a permanent working poor. In Britain today, 63 per cent
of poor children grow up in families where one member is working. For them, the
trap has closed. More than 600,000 residents of Britain’s second city, Greater
Manchester, are, reports a study, “experiencing the effects of extreme poverty”
and 1.6 million are slipping into penury.

Little of this social catastrophe is acknowledged in the bourgeois controlled
media, notably the Oxbridge dominated BBC. During the referendum campaign,
almost no insightful analysis was allowed to intrude upon the clichéd hysteria
about “leaving Europe”, as if Britain was about to be towed in hostile currents
somewhere north of Iceland.

On the morning after the vote, a BBC radio reporter welcomed politicians to his
studio as old chums. “Well,” he said to “Lord” Peter Mandelson, the disgraced
architect of Blairism, “why do these people want it so badly?” The “these
people” are the majority of Britons.

The wealthy war criminal Tony Blair remains a hero of the Mandelson “European”
class, though few will say so these days. The Guardian once described Blair as
“mystical” and has been true to his “project” of rapacious war. The day after
the vote, the columnist Martin Kettle offered a Brechtian solution to the misuse
of democracy by the masses. “Now surely we can agree referendums are bad for
Britain”, said the headline over his full-page piece. The “we” was unexplained
but understood – just as “these people” is understood. “The referendum has
conferred less legitimacy on politics, not more,” wrote Kettle. ” … the verdict
on referendums should be a ruthless one. Never again.”

The kind of ruthlessness Kettle longs for is found in Greece, a country now
airbrushed. There, they had a referendum and the result was ignored. Like the
Labour Party in Britain, the leaders of the Syriza government in Athens are the
products of an affluent, highly privileged, educated middle class, groomed in
the fakery and political treachery of post-modernism. The Greek people
courageously used the referendum to demand their government sought “better
terms” with a venal status quo in Brussels that was crushing the life out of
their country. They were betrayed, as the British would have been betrayed.

On Friday, the Labour Party leader, Jeremy Corbyn, was asked by the BBC if he
would pay tribute to the departed Cameron, his comrade in the “remain” campaign.
Corbyn fulsomely praised Cameron’s “dignity” and noted his backing for gay
marriage and his apology to the Irish families of the dead of Bloody Sunday. He
said nothing about Cameron’s divisiveness, his brutal austerity policies, his
lies about “protecting” the Health Service. Neither did he remind people of the
war mongering of the Cameron government: the dispatch of British special forces
to Libya and British bomb aimers to Saudi Arabia and, above all, the beckoning
of world war three.

In the week of the referendum vote, no British politician and, to my knowledge,
no journalist referred to Vladimir Putin’s speech in St. Petersburg
commemorating the seventy-fifth anniversary of Nazi Germany’s invasion of the
Soviet Union on 22 June, 1941. The Soviet victory – at a cost of 27 million
Soviet lives and the majority of all German forces – won the Second World War.

Putin likened the current frenzied build up of Nato troops and war material on
Russia’s western borders to the Third Reich’s Operation Barbarossa. Nato’s
exercises in Poland were the biggest since the Nazi invasion; Operation Anaconda
had simulated an attack on Russia, presumably with nuclear weapons. On the eve
of the referendum, the quisling secretary-general of Nato, Jens Stoltenberg,
warned Britons they would be endangering “peace and security” if they voted to
leave the EU. The millions who ignored him and Cameron, Osborne, Corbyn, Obama
and the man who runs the Bank of England may, just may, have struck a blow for
real peace and democracy in Europe.

By John Pilger


In
TUAEU
http://www.tuaeu.co.uk/why-the-british-said-no-to-europe/
June 2016

Nenhum comentário:

Postar um comentário